Evilmatt on Mon, 2007-12-10 13:25 madness and probably not possible URL: Someone tries to trademark NSFW Comments Isn't this FARK who are doing it? Good luck with that. I might try and trademark the less 'E' next. Submitted by brainwipe on Mon, 2007-12-10 13:49 The smart man is now trying to trademark USFW (UnSafeForWork) least thats what I do if I had the inclination. Submitted by Dwain on Mon, 2007-12-10 15:01 They'll all be unenforcable anyway. There are loads of other ways of marking the same stuff. My favourite would be !SFW ;) Submitted by byrn on Mon, 2007-12-10 15:04 or SFW Submitted by babychaos on Mon, 2007-12-10 15:04 or (not easy to type, I'll admit) SFW Submitted by byrn on Mon, 2007-12-10 15:31 Content ≠SFW Submitted by Sparky Marky on Mon, 2007-12-10 16:19 Or simply NWS. Not work safe. How many different combinations does the English language allow? Submitted by brainwipe on Mon, 2007-12-10 16:21 Y:SFWIINH? quite obviously, Yoda: Safe For Work It Is Not, Hmm? (the quite obviously is only there to stop the damn autotitle thing spoiling the mild surprise...) Submitted by byrn on Mon, 2007-12-10 16:44
Comments
Isn't this FARK who are doing it? Good luck with that. I might try and trademark the less 'E' next.
The smart man is now trying to trademark USFW (UnSafeForWork) least thats what I do if I had the inclination.
They'll all be unenforcable anyway. There are loads of other ways of marking the same stuff.
My favourite would be !SFW ;)
or SFW
or (not easy to type, I'll admit)
Content ≠SFW
Or simply NWS. Not work safe.
How many different combinations does the English language allow?
Y:SFWIINH?
quite obviously,
Yoda: Safe For Work It Is Not, Hmm?
(the quite obviously is only there to stop the damn autotitle thing spoiling the mild surprise...)